R S S : The Jason Calacanis Weblog
PageRank : 16 %
Tags: english, news, live, video, shows, time, technology, know, love, network, weblog, take, provides, think, david, edge, weblogs, without, everyone, major, getting, angeles, image, jason,
RSS FEED READER
Today, we’re excited to be launching Inside Streaming, as it has been the most popular list on the site, having recently reached its subscriber goal.
Here’s a bit more about the newsletter:
We’ve all been there. You’ve got a few hours to kill before bed and just want to start binging a great new show, but every app and platform and channel has added 18 new things since the last time you checked. And how are you supposed to know a “Bosch” from a “Goliath” without wasting valuable time watching something that might stink?
Enter Inside Streaming, a weekly email keeping you up-to-date on everything great that’s streaming now or coming soon on Netflix, Amazon, Hulu, HBO, YouTube, Go90, Seeso, Fullscreen and beyond. Plus we’ve got news on up-and-coming services, shows and movies to look out for on the horizon and lots more about the business and lifestyle of cutting the cord.
So stop scanning and start watching more great shows you love by subscribing to Inside Streaming. We send updates every Friday, but occasional bonus surprise updates just for fun.
Here’s what you can do to get involved:
The Inside.com network of newsletters continues to grow. Today we’re launching our eleventh newsletter: Inside Amazon.
It’s an in-depth, twice-weekly look at everything happening at The Everything Store. Our team is tapped into the analysts, journalists, bloggers, insiders, and experts surrounding Amazon’s various lines of business — and bringing you all the most important news in a quick and easy read.
If you own $AMZN stock, sell products on the Amazon platform, build software on AWS, or simply have an Amazon Prime membership, we think you’ll find Inside Amazon really interesting.
Four quick asks:
- Head over to Product Hunt and look for Inside Amazon and join the discussion
- Subscribe: inside.com/amazon
- Send this post to a friend who’s interested in Amazon!
- Click to tweet a one-click subscribe card for Inside Amazon (can edit before sending)
As always, post a comment and let us know what you think.
As some of you know, I’ve tried to stay out of politics my whole life, instead focusing on creating and funding startups — which in turn create jobs.
My core belief is that if people have great jobs, you’re going to have a great society. That’s why so many elections seem to revolve, predictably, around the issue of employment.
This election was about jobs, specifically the blue collar ones.
The consensus view, from everything we’re reading, about what happened on November 8th is:
- Trump won because non-college educated, white voters who feel disenfranchised came out in greater numbers than anyone anticipated, while Hillary didn’t draw out as many voters as Obama did.   [Chart 3]
- Many voted for Trump, despite some obvious and significant concerns, because they wanted a profound change in Washington.
- Polling was significantly off, causing false confidence for the Democrats.
This leads to a lot of questions:
- Why didn’t Hillary inspire more voters to come out? Have things gotten that much worse for middle America under Obama, or was it just Hillary (i.e., her “unlikable” tag)?
- Why did women vote against Hillary in such large numbers, even after Trump’s comments about women?
- Is this a one-time surge of the dwindling majority? How many more elections can this base, commonly referred to as “angry white men,” be sustained?
- Is this outcome about race, gender, personality or jobs?
- What is the future of the political parties if the GOP got elected by winning the Democratic base of blue-collar workers?
- Can anyone be president now? Is political experience still a requirement for the top job in the land, or is Trump a one-time Black Swan event where a person who didn’t serve in the military or hold political office somehow got the top job?
At its core this election is about jobs.
We believe we have an unemployment rate of four or five percent, but our system of reporting unemployment is inherently, and intentionally, skewed.  We don’t count people who have given up finding work, and those are the people — and families — I believe won the election for Trump.
If we want to bridge the gap between the “two Americas” I have a simple suggestion: we start telling the truth about employment.
In talking to the smartest kids in the class, I’ve learned that the true measure of how we are doing with jobs is simply calculated:
- What percentage of American adults have a job (the participation rate) 
- What they are getting paid (relative wages)
You can argue about what that money buys (#2), or if people are living in new ways that offer less employment and more leisure time (#1), and most of all you can study why the people who are no longer participating have opted out (aging out plays a big role).
At the end of the day we need to talk about real numbers — not politically motivated massaged ones.
We need a plan to increase wages and create jobs, that’s obvious, but we need to set the goal posts and have a politically neutral conversation about what “winning” looks like for Americans and America.
Adding to the political fun with numbers I’ve mentioned above, we now have two very important questions to answer:
- What does “acceptable employment” in the 21st century look like? (more below)
- Will the number of jobs rapidly go away due to massive advances in robotics and AI?
Here in Silicon Valley we have been really thinking about this because, candidly, we know we are starting to have an impact.
On “acceptable employment,” consider a former retail worker who loses or leaves their job and decides to contruct a life in which they Airbnb their home a couple of days a month and work two days a week for DoorDash. Doing so cuts their income by 20% but they double their leisure time, reduce their stress by 50% and are 100% happier — is that failure or success?
How do we report this person in our labour stats? According to our reporting today, they would be a failure, but the truth is they might have a much better life.
Adding to the confusion, the leisure time example above might be considered successful or a failure by the same person in the same lifetime. Heck, they might flip back and forth between full-time employment and a “lifestyle employment” every couple of years.
We are going through a reset of the 40-hour work week.
I’m guessing you’ve run into, or know, a ridesharing driver who says they drive into a major city from 60+ miles outside of the city two days a week, doing the arbitrage of 1/4th the living costs with XX%+ of hourly wages. Is this person a success or failure for figuring out how to pay <$1,000 a month for 3x the living space as someone paying $4,000 a month in the city?
How do we account for that individual in our stats? Are they happy and productive, or unhappy?
Will self-driving cars make living 60–90 miles outside of a city and commuting possible because you can work/sleep/netflix in a car going 90 MPH in no traffic? Does that solve a lot of problems around cost of living?
How do we account for that?
Candidly, we must remember that as Americans, we’ve already won when compared to the global scale — but past performance might not be indicative of future success. 
Things are moving quickly and it’s confusing for everyone. 2016 is a wake-up call, but it’s our game to lose. We are still the greatest country in the world, and with continued innovation, candidness and empathy we can lead humanity through this seismic shift in employment.
PS — Looking forward to seeing you all at launchscale.net next week. 50+ talks about how to grow your startup, plus 50 investors are hosting “founder speed dating.”
PPS — Set the date, LAUNCH Festival 2017 is on April 5th-7th!
PPPS — My startup Inside.com is up to 11 live newsletters. You should really check out the latest, Technically Sentient, about AI, as well as sign up for Inside Streaming which is starting next month and will help you select which show to binge watch next.
I’m excited to announce another fantastic newsletter today: Technically Sentient. It’s all about artificial intelligence, robotics, and neurotechnology.
This one is special, because it’s not starting from scratch like our other newsletters have. Rob May has been doing a fantastic job writing it over the past couple of years, and now he’s bringing his expertise to Inside to reach our smart, sophisticated audience.
If you think this is interesting, here are a couple of things you can do:
- Head over to Product Hunt and look for Technically Sentient, and leave a comment (I’m doing a Q&A right now)
- Subscribe: Inside.com/technically-sentient
- Forward to a friend who cares about AI.
Artificial intelligence is one of the most important areas of technology emerging today, and Rob really has his finger to the pulse of it. If you care about AI, this newsletter is simply a must-read.
As always, leave a comment and let us know what you think. — @jason
[ Tl;dr: Today we’re launching the new Inside.com – a network of high-quality email newsletters. We have eight live newsletters, and we’re launching an exciting system that allows intelligent readers like yourself to decide which newsletter we launch next. Thanks to Rocketship for building the new platform. ]
When I started Inside as an app, our idea was that if we could do an exceptional job curating the news, then millions of people would download our product and use it daily.
We learned that, while a dedicated base of fans couldn’t get enough of it, most folks didn’t have space for another app in their lives. This is a lesson that has been hard-learned by a whole crop of “news-reader” style apps – from tiny startups like Circa to mega-brands like Facebook, both of which folded their news apps.
The facts are simple: people are adding an average of ZERO new apps to their phones each month, and most modern news consumption happens in social media) places like Facebook, Twitter, Snapchat, Reddit, and, of course, email).
Meanwhile, publishers increasingly rely on viral traffic – which incentivizes silly clickbait, or worse they focus on writing headlines that rank in Google (best iPhone cases FTW!).
Email incentivizes the opposite — it drives us to build a lasting relationship with our readers who demand we deliver massive value. If we don’t they click unsubscribe.
I love that newsletters are held to such a high standard — it makes our writers focused on what matters most.
When it comes to news curation, here’s what we think matters:
1) Content selected by real-world relevance, not catchy titles or more-searched terms.
2) Content selected and presented in a fair way without obvious bias or added commentary.
3) Transparency. No hidden agendas. Literally email us and ask us why we ran a story and we’ll tell you.
We’re going all in with email newsletters because I think we can save journalism by putting 99 cents of every dollar we spend on writers. Our business has close to zero infrastructure costs and massive consumer feedback.
Nine months ago, we started with the Inside Daily Brief, a twice-daily roundup of the most interesting news in the world, which had 10,000 subscribers and just one writer/editor. Now, we have an audience of 100,000 subscribers across eight newsletters, with six people on our editorial team (and it’s growing!).
We’re just getting started.
In addition to letting you subscribe to our existing newsletters, the new site also lets you vote for which newsletters we’ll launch next. Do you want us to hire a top notch writer and launch Inside Golf or Inside Space or Inside Video Games?
Cast your vote, and tell your friends – when we hit 5,000 “early adopters” we’ll launch it.
So, here’s my ask:
- Head over to inside.com and subscribe/vote for all the newsletters you find most interesting
- Check out our post today on Product Hunt and leave some feedback
- Tell your friends! If we can keep growing the readership of these newsletters, we can keep improving and launching new ones. That starts with you spreading the word.
- Hit reply to the emails we send and tell us what you love, if we make a mistake and share an intelligent response to the question of the day. I read every email reply!
PS – Here’s our subscriber growth in the past few months:
If you have a newsletter and you want to join our network, please email firstname.lastname@example.org. We’re looking to not only launch our own newsletters, but host and sell the advertising in other ones too.
There are two huge topics of discussion in Silicon Valley right now. The first is “Who will win the level 4 autonomy race, Tesla or Uber?,” and the second is “Is Apple in trouble?”
[ Click to Tweet (can edit before sending): http://ctt.ec/1132X ]
One of the greatest parts of my life, and boy do I lead a charmed life, is that, for some crazy reason, the smartest kids in the class have decided they like to hang out with me.
I’ve been asking my investor, founder and journalist friends what worries them about Apple, and I’ve been giving it a lot of thought myself. Here are the top six (valid) reasons I’ve compiled:
1. iPhone 7 announcement fell flat
2. Project Titan is anything but
3. The Underwhelming Watch
4. How is Apple MIA on VR & AR?
5. Machine Learning & AI
6. Jobs said he solved TV, but we can’t see it
We wanted VR, we wanted a new form factor and Howard Stern wanted holographic phone calls. We got Samsung’s waterproofing from two years ago, a new color (or lack of color), a camera upgrade and they took our headphone jack.
I’m actually excited about the camera upgrades, as I’ve got kids and I like taking pictures of food, but I know that I’m in the minority of people who will upgrade a 12-24 month-old phone just to take slightly better pictures.
Those of us who drop our phones into the toilet, or who spend too much time emailing in the hot tub, will certainly appreciate the waterproofing. I’ve started to see friends making videos underwater on the Cape with the Samsung waterproof smartphone and it’s cool, but the iPhone 7 is rated just under the Samsung in terms of water protection.
As an aside, it’s kind of cool that there is actually a rating system around “immersion protection,” with the iPhone 7 being resistant and the Samsung being able to operate underwater for 30 minutes (more).
Is this Apple’s shortcoming, or simply a sign that we’ve hit Peak Smartphone? Probably 50-50, and that’s a huge problem for Apple, either way.
More importantly, Android’s operating system continues to get tighter and easier to use, and don’t get me started on how much better Google’s Project Fi is than AT&T or Verizon’s offerings, providing a real reason to switch to Android: less carrier pain!
Apple really should make their own Project Fi, as the best part of Android is kicking out Verizon.
Reports are they’ve rebooted away from making their own car, and earlier this year we heard they couldn’t find a partner for the project (i.e., BMW or Mercedes). The car is the missing piece to the puzzle, and the facts that they can’t get a partner, and have decided to not release their own project is really sad — or it’s a diversionary tactic!
Seriously, it’s completely possible Apple is making the car and is doing a MASSIVE head fake to the industry by leaking that they will simply be a software provider.
The Underwhelming Watch
Everyone I know bought the watch and very few are still using it. They added GPS and made it swim proof in version 2.0, but that is basically a catch-up move. My Fitbit Surge lasts for a week on a charge and has had GPS for a couple of years.
Clearly Apple missed the mark with a timepiece and now realize they need to specialize and win over the athletes. I give them credit for that.
My prediction: The smartwatch is DOA until they can put a 4G connection into it and make it a standalone device. Imagine being able to call an Uber, check your email and make a phone call on your watch while leaving your phone at home — that’s compelling!
How is Apple MIA on VR & AR?
If any company should own the VR & AR space, it’s Apple, which has a massive App Store with loyal developers, sexy hardware and made-to-use chips that are exceptional at graphics. Yet, here we are, with Oculus being bought by Facebook and leading the pack along with…. HTC’s Vive. Samsung, Google, Sony and Microsoft have really compelling products in the market as well.
Heck, Snapchat is making some AR glasses as we speak, which I’m predicting will feature people’s Snapcodes above their heads while allowing you to “blink three times quickly” to publish the last seven seconds of your life.
Yep, Snapchat will release a “Life DVR” before Apple even announces something.
That’s seven major competitors out there getting it done and we don’t even have a rumor about an Apple product. Now, VR & AR are very new and there is no clear winner, so it is possible that Apple could come from behind — like they did in smartphones and tablets — and lap the competition. But given their recent track record, it is strange we’re not even hearing rumors.
Machine Learning and AI
Apple took forever to figure out the cloud and now it looks like the same pattern might be playing itself out again with machine learning and AI.
The sexy features in products we’ll be using in the coming years might not be measured in design and hardware specs, but rather in intelligence. Do you care about what the car looks like or the fact that it doesn’t let you get in a fender bender (or lets you sleep on the way to work)?
Will you care about the UX of your next email app and calendar, or the fact that it prioritizes your email perfectly, and finds the perfect cafe, time and people to invite to solve your latest business meeting needs?
All the good stuff coming will be based on machine learning and AI and that doesn’t play to Apple’s strength — but boy does it play to Google’s!
Jobs said he solved TV, but we can’t see it
Famously, Steve Jobs told Walt Mossberg that he had solved the TV issue, and that he was going to do an actual physical TV — not just the current hockey puck device called “Apple TV” that you plug into your Samsung TV. (The one that comes with a kickass Smarthub built in that does 90% of what Apple TV already does, and some things it refuses to do, like support Amazon Prime!)
There has been no word on a physical TV in a long, long time, and Apple can’t seem to figure out how to do a skinny bundle for an OTT (over the top) service.
The Big Question People Aren’t Asking Publicly — Yet
It’s super annoying when folks say “Steve Jobs would have gotten this done” and “Jobs would never have stood for this,” but the reason folks say it is because Jobs was that good at getting the final 10% or 20% out of product — and Apple.
Without Steve, Apple seems to be getting by just fine, but these six red flags are leading folks to believe that maybe, just maybe, it’s time to start thinking about putting a visionary product person in the top seat and having Cook move back to the more natural position of COO.
Tim Cook has kept the ship tight at Apple, but there is a growing sense among the most elite and informed people I talk to that someone with a bold product — or corporate M&A — vision needs to take over.
Founder authority, which is driving Tesla, Google, Netflix, Uber, Amazon and Facebook to dizzying heights of audacious innovation, is what’s missing at Apple today. Cook has managed the transition exceptionally when you look at the stunning balance sheet, but someone has to step into the driver’s seat and prepare Apple to compete with Elon, Larry, Reed, Travis, Jeff and Mark — who are just getting started.
In my follow-up piece, I’ll outline “the Path to a Trillion,” but for now, what do you think are the biggest threats to Apple out of those six? Are there any other issues that belong in the top six?
All the best, @jason
PS – I’m writing this on my iMac Retina, while my iPhone 6s and iPad Pro charge on the desk, but I’m wearing a Fitbit Surge and have my Nexus 6 in my pocket. I just bought my first Windows machine in years to power my Oculus headset. I’m 80% Apple, 20% other right now — and the Apple part is shrinking fast.
PPS – Our next event will feature speed dating with the 100 founders who are the most ready for their Series A, pitching to the 50 top investors in the world. You get 10 minutes to quickly meet, so this is super efficient for everyone. Founders and investors apply here.
Founders, friends & investors,
On November 14-15 we will invite 2,000 of you to join us for the 4th edition of our SCALE conference.
The SCALE conference has two tracks featuring 26 speakers each, and we focus on the two most important aspects of running a startup:
2. Raising Money
This year we are also introducing “Founder | Investor: Speed Dating,” which will be 12-minute sessions between the 100 startups we’ve determined are the “most likely to scale” in the next 18 months and the 50 investors we think are the most active and helpful in the industry (both VCs & angels). Founders & investors apply for speed dating here.
There are seven ways you can participate in the event:
1. FREE TICKETS FOR FOUNDERS: Founders can come for free by clicking to tweet this message (limited to the first 1,000 folks): http://ctt.ec/lt362
2. Buy a Summit ticket for $295, which includes lunch & downloadable copies of all the videos from the event for your team. launchscale.net/tickets
3. Buy a VIP ticket for $995, which includes lunch, videos of all the talks, and a seat at the two intimate dinners. launchscale.net/tickets
4. If you build a tool or provide a service for startups and/or investors, you can present your tool for 10 minutes on stage in exchange for helping support the event as a partner. Email email@example.com
5. You can nominate someone (including yourself) to be part of the SCALE 100 speed-dating program, which is limited to 100 founders. In order to be in the SCALE 100 you need to have a product in market that has traction but that has NOT raised Series A. The goal of speed dating is to introduce the “up and coming” startups that are getting ready for their series A in the next 3-18 months. If your startup is pre-traction, you should apply to present at the LAUNCH Festival (announcement coming October 1st). Nominate your start-up
6. We have 10 (unpaid) speaking slots left for founders or investors. If you would like to talk at this event the best way is to pitch us on a talk with the format of “How I built COMPANY NAME from X to Z, and from A to F, doing these three things.” Every talk at SCALE is designed to be massively helpful in either growing your company or helping you raise capital.
7. We have eight paid speaking slots with demo tables for partners who are looking to demo their products or services to the audience. Email firstname.lastname@example.org if interested.
WHY OUR EVENTS HAVE THE BEST CONTENT
All of our speakers must rehearse their talks at least one time with me and my team. We give candid feedback and rank the talks before you see them. We do not allow anyone on stage who doesn’t score an 8.5 of 10 on our internal scoring system. Additionally, we ask all of our attendees to rank each speaker and we send those rankings to the speakers, along with your comments. We invite the speakers who are in the top 1/3rd to speak again the next year.
All the best, @jason
PS – Featured talks are listed below. Four stars indicate that this was a top-rated speaker at one of our previous events.
****How to Get 100,000 Users for Your Bot in 100 Days, Adelyn Zhou, TopBots
Ed Catmull, President of Pixar & Disney Animation, & author of “Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration”
Hi everyone, Producer Jacqui here. We were honored to have Ed Catmull in the studio with Jason last week for an epic conversation we had no choice but to split into two parts. But you can watch them both here. Enjoy!
[ Click to Tweet (can edit before sending): http://ctt.ec/0UyJ0 ]
Subscribe in iTunes: http://bit.ly/
Ed Catmull President of Pixar-Disney and author of “Creativity, Inc.: Overcoming the Unseen Forces That Stand in the Way of True Inspiration” is one of the greatest startup founders in the history of Silicon Valley. Today he joins Jason on This Week in Startups to share his own personal story, perhaps the best that has come out of Pixar. We learn about Ed’s journey from his early days as a pioneer of computer animation, being hired by George Lucas to run the computer division at Lucasfilm, working with Steve Jobs to form Pixar (ultimately Pixar-Disney) and leading it to meteoric success. Ed takes us into his existential crisis after megahit Toy Story, behind the storytelling scenes of The Incredibles, Ratatouille, and Inside Out, and around the risks, triumphs and failures that led to his building a massively successful and creative culture.
PART 1 – Timestamps
00:20-09:17: Jason introduces his guest, Ed Catmull, and starts off by asking him about his early inspirations of being an animator.
09:38-11:28: Ed shares an early model he made of his hand and explains how he wrote the programming language to make it move.
13:10-16:05: Alexander Schure, President of the New York Institute of Technology, hires Ed to start an R&D lab in Long Island, NY.
16:40-17:30: At 25 years of age, Ed says No to working on the Space Mountain ride for Disney, because it didn’t line up with his goal of making a film
17:51-22:51: Ed explains why he thinks Star Wars is the single most impactful film in the history of the motion pictures industry.
26:57-30:26: Ed describes what it was like working with George Lucas, and the birth of Pixar.
30:58-34:27: The journey of Steve Jobs, and how it changed him.
35:02-36:06: Despite the difficult times of failure at Pixar, Ed recounts how everyone stayed together and became a cohesive group of people who shared hard times, trusted each other, and had each others’ backs.
40:00-41:35: Jason and Ed talk about the history of Ed’s short films, and how Luxo was the transformational piece.
43:48-48:35: The making of Toy Story, the risks & negotiations behind it.
48:56-49:58: Jason asks Ed what the main “switch” in the Toy Story story line and when he knew it would be a great film.
50:51-53:20: After the release of Toy Story, Ed found that reviews were mostly about the story, and not about computer graphics. Pixar goes public.
PART 2 – Timestamps
1:16-6:16 Ed reveals the two big questions he faced following Toy Story’s success and Pixar going public.
6:17-9:52: Ed explains why “candid” is a powerful word.
13:30-14:52: Jason talks about why Ratatouille is his favorite Pixar film and asks Ed about the origin of the Anton Ego speech.
14:53-18:36: Brad Bird’s influence in Ratatouille, and why they had to fight to get The Incredibles made.
18:37-20:08: Ed explains the research that goes into their films in order to achieve the feeling of authenticity.
23:35-24:42: Why Inside Out is the single most impactful film.
25:12-26:05: Ed breaks down the 3 phases of risks.
27:27-29:32: Jason asks Ed what his favorite moment from a Pixar film is.
33:38-36:27: Ed reveals the flaw that Disney caught in Inside Out.
37:56-43:08: Ed describes the merging with Disney, how they removed the barriers, and the challenges of keeping a culture safe.
43:39-46:02: The two discuss the human condition in Toy Story, and what makes good filmmaking.
46:27-50:04: Ed imparts advice on how to build a safe culture.
51:29-53:10: Jason asks Ed about his thoughts on virtual reality.
53:11-54:25: Ed expresses his thoughts on using skepticism as a tool.
57:32-58:20: Lucasfilm and Disney/Pixar are different entities and have different working models, but the teams all still communicate with each other.
01:01:04-01:02:25: Ed talks about his father.
01:02:26-01:08:06: Ed describes how we are living in a time that feels surreal, and the two explore what’s wrong with today’s times.
We’ve been on a roll at Inside, launching and growing email newsletters. In the past 6 months we’ve gone from one newsletter with a total of 10,000 subscribers, to 6 newsletters with a total of 100,000 subscribers — and we’re just getting started.
These newsletters aren’t crafted by algorithms, and they go much deeper than just a curated list of links. We have a talented (and growing!) editorial team that dives deep into each vertical we tackle: scouring the top blogs and the obscure ones, participating in the online communities, learning which reporters are really nailing it, and digging in to deliver a polished, comprehensive roundup of everything you need to know.
Today we’re launching Inside SF, a newsletter all about the Bay Area. We’re covering everything from breaking news to politics and housing to fun stuff like events and new restaurants, five days per week.
If you live in the Bay Area, we’d really appreciate if you give it a try and let us know what you think. Also, it’s up on Product Hunt today, and we’d love if you join the discussion there.
Soon we’re going to be rolling out a platform that brings all of this work together more cohesively, but in the meantime, here are all the Inside newsletters you can subscribe to:
As always, leave a reply and let us know what you think. — @jason
PS: to celebrate the launch, we’re giving away a $150 gift card to Pizzeria Delfina. Enter to win here.
Twitter is an exceptionally important platform, but it’s struggling massively in the past couple of years because it can’t figure out how to be an open, anonymous platform, while controlling harassment.
[ Click to Tweet (can edit before sending): http://ctt.ec/kVdC0 ]
It’s kind of embarrassing that Twitter can’t figure this out on their own, so I figured I would redesign the product and write the memo to the user base for their CEO Jack.
You’re welcome! @jason Calacanis
[A troll-free twitter is coming. Image by @paljasma]
Evolving Twitter, A message from our CEO
By @Jack, January 1st, 2017
On behalf of the Twitter team I’d like to wish you a happy new year and thank you for not only using our service, but for passionately sharing with us how you would like to see it evolve with the hashtag #twitter2017.
Today we’re taking a major step in the evolution of Twitter by rolling out verified accounts to all of our users. Verification isn’t a perfect process, and it will take a year to give our most active users the blue check mark, but we think it will be worth it because people will have to “own their words.”
You can visit verified.twitter.com to start the verification process.
We are going to still allow anonymity on Twitter, because we all know that some voices need to be heard without revealing their identity. From political dissidents to parody accounts, anonymity has a place on the service, but as we’ve seen, some small percentage of users are abusing anonymity in order to harass people.
That’s going to end.
Twitter will soon be “verified only” by default. What this means is you will only see users with the blue check mark, with Tweets from unverified accounts being “blurred out.”
If you want to test this right now visit verified.twitter.com or go to your settings and click on “verified only” on your mobile app.
Here is an example of a tweet from the self-admitted troll, Milo Yiannopoulos, whom we recently kicked off the platform for harassment. In this example, actor Leslie Jones is not following Milo’s @nero account, which is unverified and is tweeting to Leslie’s @lessdoggg handle.
[Since Milo is unverified, his tweets, which are often trolling in nature, would be blurred by default until Leslie followed him. By @willmerchan]
After clicking on the blurred-out tweet I can read it and see three buttons: block, follow and an X (to close the tweet).
If you block the person you will never hear from that anonymous account again. If you follow them you’ll simply follow them like any other user (this sends us a signal that this might be a quality account).
If you hit X or do nothing their tweets will remain collapsed in the future.
Please visit “verified Twitter” at verified.twitter.com to get a feel for the service and give feedback to me directly @jack. On June 1st 2017 everyone will move to “verified by default.”
If you want Twitter to remain the way it’s always been, you will have that option by selecting “show unverified accounts in my timeline” in your settings.
All the best,
[ Note from @jason: hope you can all make it to the SCALE conference we’re hosting on November 14-15 in SF. We’ve just announced our first 17 of 52 speakers who will talk about how to raise money for, and how to grow, your startup, including Philip Krim of Casper, Jason Lemkin of SaaStr, Melody McCloskey of StyleSeat, Tomasz Tunguz of Redpoint and Clara Brenner of Tumml. If you want to speak about a topic please email email@example.com or go to launchscale.net/speakers and fill out the form. ]
0 | 10