HOME > RSS > BLOGS France > Vers un nouveau marketing

R S S : Vers un nouveau marketing

PageRank : 1 %

VoteRank :
(0 - 0 vote)

tagsTags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Français - French


The Evolution of Retail

9 September, by Vanina Delobelle[ —]
The Evolution of Retail

How VR will save retail

9 August, by Vanina Delobelle[ —]
How VR will save retail
As Augmented reality is able to enhance the store experience, Virtual Reality brings the store to customers. It is the very first time, when customers can really have the store in their house. They do not have to drive, it comes to them. It is not an e-Commerce store, where products are presented in a different way or where browsing and searching for a product is not enjoyable but really a store. It is an experience that is exciting and efficient. No need to browse through 52 pages of dresses. You have the shelves and at a glance can see which product you like and then you can dig more. Customers do not like the 50 pages results they get; They usually stop at page 4 or 5. So the notion of endless aisle or the notion of large inventory is actually more annoying to customers than it is serving the cause. Customers want to get to the point. They want to see things they like right away and then dig more into their selection. This is where recommendations should solve it for e-Commerce but I do not think we are yet using it in an efficient way. We use it as a secondary element, while it should the heart of what we serve to customers.

The way VR enables to present products is way more powerful. We can play with the product, we can play with the environment and we can bring more sparkle to shopping.

You can even think that you will be able to be in a store, that will be live streamed. Now you love the Louis Vuitton store in Les Champs Elysées and you will be able to get to this store, whether you live in Tokyo, New York, Weston FL, Vladivostok or Perth.

What if now each of us would have our own shop and no two people will have the same? You would go to a store only for you, with your personal associate, who will know all about you and will be able to help you and talk to you along the process. Everybody would be a VIP and shop the same way as we can sometimes shop at some luxury brands. I, as the customer, am at the center of all!

Customers are bored today. They have too many choices and are lost because they do not know what to choose anymore. We sink them into pages of results and plethora of products that are of no interest to them. They are getting a very bad customer service so they are not loyal. They are price conscious and are show rooming before making their purchase

They go to stores because they need to, but do not enjoy it as much because it is crowded, far, it is cold outside, they do not have the finances, they have kids or are in the rush. Shopping becomes a commodity and is no longer enjoyable as it used to be. Malls are still a social place for teens, who hang out and shop sometimes.

Family members are further away from each other. People spend more time on digital channels and do not have time or stamina to deal with a rude associate, go to a store where the products they want are not available or get frustrated because there is nothing they like. With VR, they get to a store, with things they like, with a nice human interaction, where they can try the product and it will be available because the endless aisle will kick in the back of the process.

So what if a store would no longer a store? What if the store we are used to with shelves is no longer the norm? Why couldn’t we buy our bathing suit on a Bahamas beach, our coffee in a farm in Costa Rica, Kevin Garnett’s Jersey directly on the Celtic’s field, Kathy Perry’s music at Kathy’s home…? Can the intrinsic notion of store can just be redefined? Now we are reinventing retail!

Is technology evolving too quickly for retailers?

5 August, by Vanina Delobelle[ —]
I was at an executive summit and during a roundtable we started talking technology. Somebody said that the technology goes too fast. As retailers, we are still thinking about implementing a solution that a new one comes in. Retailers are facing a lot of disruptions the past 10 years. The market is moving fast and they need to adapt. Some retailers cannot keep up. For example, while most retailers were jumping on the wagon of Ship from Store in 2010, some do not have the functionality yet.

I created a timeline trying to summarize when each technology became mainstream for retailers.

Is technology evolving too quickly for retailers?
Is the technology evolving too quickly or retailers being too slow?

With the new technologies coming on board, retailers can no longer do everything in house. This business model is no longer viable unless they have an army of engineers and retailers who can afford it are rare.

By the time they figure out what others have already solved for, the market is further away. Why should we reinvent things that are already developed and for which some people spent numerous hours of their life figuring out?

In addition, is this particular technology going to be best for me? I need to be able to identify the technology, try it at a decent price and decide for myself if this is what I need for the longer run. I also need to be able to tweak the technology in different ways until I find the right angle working for my business.

The best solution to move fast and allow me to try quickly is to work with people, who know what they are talking about and who made their living of this particular technology. I had been into conversations, where we were wondering if we were going to build a call center or a CRM in house. This is silly! There are so many options there. Make a good selection, go through the evaluation process and work with a vendor. They know what they are doing. They are doing this for years so what makes us think we can do it better than them?

In addition, the scalability and the profitability of the development will never be able to balance. They keep developing functionalities that we can inherit easily. Building it once can be easy but then, how about enhancements and maintenance?

Some years ago, the question buy vs. build was probably valid but today, because of a faster market, I always take the buy route.

A lot of larger corporations, in order to innovate, do not do it themselves; They acquire startups, which figured it out for themselves. They know, that they would never be able to be as nimble and as sharp as startups who live and breath for a very specific functionality.

In our fast moving technology era, the best way to approach the challenge, is to set up a test with an existing solution. Assess and then broaden the project or not. Wash, rinse and do it again so that you are always up to date and always on top of customer expectations.

The biggest hurdles to digital transformation

2 August, by Vanina Delobelle[ —]
The biggest hurdles to digital transformation
Many executives leading digital transformation are sharing their frustrations and the challenges they are facing. The road to digital transformation is not easy for these people, who are given the task but not the means. Digital transformation is not new. A lot of people are tackling the subject for many years now and they all relate the same challenges.

Barb is working for an insurance company. She is relating that her colleagues are seeing her as a thread. They see her as the evil, who is going to put them out of work, so the resistance is intense from the departments. She has one champion, who is protecting her but she is the number one enemy for most people. All she achieves is so complicated, while it could be way simpler if she did not to face so much resistance. She spends most of her time lobbying rather than doing.

George is working for a professional services company. He is tasked with digital transformation but the budget is not there. He does not have the tools, he does not have the metrics, he does not have the people and the budget is insufficient to do what is right. He does what he can with what he has and already achieves great success but it is way less than what could be achieved. The company has a lot of potential but does not see it. He is seeing each day this missed opportunity and it is depressing him.

Ellen is working for a fashion company. The company is talking about implementing functionalities that should have already been implemented years ago. There seems that the basics are discussed, while the market is moving forward. The progress is slow. People do not understand and spend more time debating than doing. They are taken over by brands, which are far more innovative.

Ken is working for a retailer, who wants to bring his eCommerce in house. In the CEO eyes, this is just a store front to build. When Ken explains that bringing eCommerce in house involves having also an inventory manager, a call center and connecting to other systems, then the project does not take the same dimension and the investment amount is not as imagined. Also the CEO did not anticipate that now he will need to have the skillsets in house to manage all this. Ken will be spending a year just to educate and to stir the project to the right direction.

Adam is working for a catalog retailer. The team is old school. He is trying to push digital but the catalog is still the center of attention and spend. Designing for print and designing for digital is different. He is having hard time getting them out from the old ways. The ‘’legacy’’ consider him as an outsider and do not value his inputs to the level they should. He keeps having to fight for his business unit and making sure he is getting the resources he needs.

A lot of stories showing that most companies want the transformation but the reality is different. They want the transformation but they do not assign the right resources to it or the budget. What is the magic? They want the transformation but it should not disturb. How can we change without changing? They want the transformation but still want to measure using the same metrics. Isn’t is measuring apples to oranges? They want the transformation but use the same people as the ones they currently have. Don’t you need people who know what they are doing? They want the transformation but only in this area. Is it still a transformation then? They want the transformation but do not want to touch their existing technology. Do you know that digital requires technology? They want the transformation but no impact to the EPS. How can you make an investment without impact? The list of contradictions is long.

I will summarize the major hurdles to transformation:
  • The authority: transformation leaders are the owners of the transformation but because it touches a lot of departments, they work in a matrix organization and have to get everybody along. They keep a limited authority on the tasks and therefore can get stopped by any department, which does not want to collaborate. The politics take on the larger goal.
  • The budget: the organization does not always understand that in order to transform you need some budget. They heard that digital is cheap so because it is cheap, let’s just not give them money. Yes digital is cheaper but the organization does have to invest to put the things right before it can see the benefits. The benefits usually come very quickly and the ROI is high but it might mean spending couple of million dollars for the years the transformation will be set up.
  • The duration: People believe this is going to take 5-10 years to get there so no need to rush. It does not have to be long. What makes it long is usually the lack of understanding, the resistance or the politics that interfere with the process. What can also elongate the process is the budget not being attributed correctly so we have to piecemeal everything in order to be able to achieve the goal. I am not saying tho that a big bang is the way to go. It has to go by steps but sometimes the steps are much longer than needed.
  • The scope: transformation has to touch everything. When we are talking about transformation, we are talking about product, technology, systems, processes, skillsets and especially mindset. We cannot become digital without the right systems or still working with a waterfall process. Digital is going quickly. It is changing often. We need to be able to adapt and therefore the organization needs to be set up in a way to be able to move quickly.
  • The skillsets: finding true digital people and especially people who have lead a digital transformation is not easy. The skillsets are very specific. In addition, the digital people do cost more but companies are not always understanding or willing to pay more so they end up using existing resources who are not savvy or getting people with very little experience. In some areas it is harder to find talents and a lot of organizations are not yet open to get remote people or commuting people to be able to afford the right expertise. The lack of talents is therefore limiting the performance of the teams.
  • The technology: legacy systems, old infrastructures or missing capabilities are also hurting a lot the transformation. When the systems are not adequate, we have to equip the firm with the right infrastructure and these are costs that were not always anticipated.
  • The lack of savviness: the transformation leader is very often his own species in the pond. He is here because the board knows they need such expertise but without really knowing what they need him for or not understanding the scope of what he can achieve. A lot of leaders still have to fight old waves and are therefore not always given the support they need. They have to go through a lot of education to move things along.
  • The short term vision: Digital transformation is an investment. Some CFOs only look at the impact to the quarter or to the year. Their goal is to cut costs and save money in order to increase the bottom line. In fact, a transformation needs some investment and it will get a ROI over multiple years. Because a lot of firms need to respond to their shareholders, investing is not always the priority as it might hurt their earnings per share. We can reduce significantly the impact but the board needs to be ready to give away 1 cent or 2 to achieve a goal that will get a much higher payback in the future. The short term vision and earnings are very often conflicting with the long term savings.
  • The fear of disruption: people are comfortable with what they know and what they have been doing for years. Nobody usually wants the change, however change is inevitable. As soon as the transformation will start, some people will not be happy and will start complaining. The company needs to make it clear that this is the direction to go and not provide an audience to the naysayers. People fear for their jobs, leaders fear to lose some people, people have to adapt and learn new skills. Leaders know that a culture change needs to happen but do not want the rumblings that go with it. The change can be smooth but it cannot be perfect as there will always be some people, who are just fine with the status quo as it is way more reinsuring.

So now why this needs to happen and all the hurdles need to be removed?
  • There are 100 million new businesses launched globally each year. They go faster, they have new ideas and these small fishes are pushing the big ones out. So it is a matter of life or death to be able to transform constantly.
  • Humans, products and companies all follow a lifecycle. The company always needs to prepare the next big thing in order to replace the one getting old if it wants to survive in the long run.
  • Companies like Amazon are investing constantly and are not afraid to take an EPS hit as they know they will come back stronger in 2 years and eat them all. For example, Amazon is talking about VR while some other retailers are still debating to deploy ship from store.
  • The pace of technology is increasing. Now we have a new revolution every 5 years, while before it was every 10 years. We are now even going to see huge changes every 2 years. Who can stay and just watch what is happening there and believe he can survive?

The reality is there. Companies have to face it. Remember when in 2007 some people were saying that the iPhone will not take off. Where are we today? Are we still looking at the iPhone on the other side of the road? No! It invaded our lives! CEO and boards need to embrace the change and understand where the market is going. Digital leaders should not face such resistance and they should not share this unanimous frustration about what is happing in corporations. They know what they are doing, they are here for the company survival, let them operate. Would you put everything in the way of a neurosurgeon, who you selected to remove this tumor in your brain, and who can offer you many more years of life?

Disclaimer: Some names and identifying details have been changed to protect the privacy of individuals.

Virtual Reality Casino

14 June, by Vanina Delobelle[ —]
Virtual Reality Casino
Virtual Reality is touching all the industries. Gaming has been the first industry to go through the VR revolution. Gaming has extended to Casino gambling now.

This is how we can see some online casinos like Vegas Palms online casino Canada transform into a Casino where we can play for real and feel exactly the same as if we were at a table in Vegas.

Virtual reality is immersive. It puts the player right in the atmosphere and he can get the same feelings. Isn’t it great to travel to Vegas, be at a table and all this right from my sofa? We are not talking here about a simple flat experience, but about a true experience.

Some use VR for entertainment, other use it for therapy. How about resolving some gaming addiction? VR helps with depression, fear of heights, post traumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, paranoia, fear of people and many others. By exposing the person to the situation she fears, it helps retrain slowly the brain. Maybe gamblers can get their life back by using VR.

What would it mean if we would use a VR Casino environment to teach our kids probabilities? I remember my Math teacher, who was always making us visualize dices to learn probabilities. Wouldn’t it had been much more fun if it was done in a real situation?

Virtual Reality is not only for games. There are so many things we can do. How about people with physical challenges, who cannot drive to a Casino? Can’t they play sometimes too?

The beauty of VR compared to online is that it mixes multiple senses. You can see, hear, touch (and also smell in some cases - there are some experiences enabling smells but it is still at the beginning) all together. In addition you are in a unique environment, cut from reality so the experience is total.

There is a company, which uses VR for weight loss. They created tastes and it is like if you were eating real food but in fact you are not but your brain is tricked so you feel satisfied and do not want to eat more. Isn’t it better than taking pills or going through surgery?

The time, when I was watching Avatar and we were excited about is now. This fantasy is becoming reality. Some are talking about fad. I do not believe it. They were saying the same about social media 10 years ago and they were wrong. VR is a new revolution that everybody needs to take. From Vegas Palms online casino to medicine, manufacturing, retail, education and many more. It is here for real. Who said that we needed to live in one dimension only? Why couldn’t we live multiple realities at the same time? What is reality? The world is changing. With Robots, the human race is evolving to a new level. Scary for some, fascinating for others, but real for all.

mirPod.com is the best way to tune in to the Web.

Search, discover, enjoy, news, english podcast, radios, webtv, videos. You can find content from the World & USA & UK. Make your own content and share it with your friends.

HOME add podcastADD PODCAST FORUM By Jordi Mir & mirPod since April 2005....